Call for input: Human Rights in the Administration of Justice – Neurotechnology and other emerging technologies – Report of the Secretary General

Monday, 3/9/2026,

Dear Sirs,

In regards to 79/172, the General Assembly requested “the Secretary-General to submit to the General Assembly at its eighty-first session a report on the latest developments, challenges and good practices in human rights in the administration of justice, including, inter alia, on the latest developments, risks and required safeguards regarding the potential use of neurotechnology and other emerging technologies in the administration of justice, and on the activities undertaken by the United Nations system as a whole,” here are my perceptions.

From my perspective, there have been no regards to human safety, human rights, principles of the Common Rule, legality of nonconsensual human experimentation, or risk of harm to human subjects. This is a program not just pushing boundaries, but by far exceeding the mother of all gross human rights atrocities ever known to man, implemented with no more regard than to ultimately control the will of man, and with no regard to humanity, law, administration of justice, protection of neural data, human rights, civil rights, the rights to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, freedom of opinion and expression, freedom from torture and ill-treatment, the rights to privacy, liberty and security, fair trial and due process, non-discrimination, or gender equality.

This program of human mind control is the most inhuman, perverted, deplorable, shameful, disgusting, atrocious, execrable, vile, and wretched act of all of humanity, ever. This is a program that is proven to disproportionately target women because it’s a program predominately run or operated by men. Targets include adolescents and very young children. From associations with other targeted individuals, I know it also involves the incapable elderly and other vulnerable populations. There appears to be no measures taken to ensure accountability and access to remedies for violations of human rights resulting from use of neurotechnology. It shames me at times to be American because of the acts of U.S. intelligence agencies. If it sounds like I’m angry, it’s because I am.

The next section contains medical images showing microchips, images showing facial microwave and laser burns, facial scarification, stun gun and electroshock burns to temples and chest leaving small distinctive-shaped burn scars and descriptions of physical and mental symptoms from these assaults, and images of incisions from non-consensual and experimental surgical procedures taken over a multi-year period.

These practices are clearly illegal under U.S. Federal law. The Bill of Rights and the Common Rule are also supposed to protect our rights from non-consensual human experimentation and our rights as U.S. citizens they’re being trodden on. In addition, various states such as Colorado, Oregon, California, and Minnesota have passed legislation to protect citizens’ neural data and other legislation to protect people from the nefarious uses of these technologies.

DODM 5200.01, Volumes 1-3, and the NISPOM: The only lawful reason to classify information is to protect national security. And that information must be declassified as soon as it no longer qualifies for classification. Information must not be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified for any other reason. Information is prohibited from being classified to conceal violations of law.

Section 18 U.S.C. 2340A of Title 18, United States Code prohibits torture committed by public officials under color of law against persons within the public official’s custody or control. Torture is defined to include acts specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering. There is Federal extraterritorial jurisdiction over such acts whenever the perpetrator is a national of the United States or the alleged offender is found within the United States.

Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 2261A) outlines the elements of federal stalking, which include actions like crossing state lines with the intent to harass, intimidate, or place someone under surveillance, and engaging in conduct that causes the victim to fear for their safety or suffer emotional distress.

I’m a U.S. citizen and I live in a torture state with a corrupted government. I am a targeted individual and have been stalked and assaulted continually since February 2000—now 26 years. I am targeted because I was unknowingly associating with a person who was the subject of either non-consensual testing or other abuse or of apparent surveillance/harassment technology, and I accidentally disrupted a federal investigation in my hometown.

My homes and computers have been illegally searched. My hard drive was partitioned, and I found unrecognized files on my computer. I searched for objects with the same date and found and removed compiled files from the drive. I believe these were the FBI’s Magic Lantern keystroke-logging program. Shortly after discovering these files, I became targeted in February 2000, and have since been a victim of V2K, nonconsensual human experimentation, and ongoing assaults and torture.

I’ve experienced unspeakable violations of my bodily autonomy and have since had round the clock voice to skull (V2K) transmission into my head, while also being forced to involuntarily share every thought through interrogation, data mining, and probing of my thoughts where they use names, thoughts, and memories to trigger recall of deeper memories. Besides interrogation, I am subjected to cruel and vicious hazing, taunting, and threats to my freedom and life. I’m frequently called by expletives, cursed at, and told I’m going to spend the rest of my life in prison, or my physical safety and life is threatened.

My vehicles have been tampered with. My homes and electronic devices have been searched surreptitiously, and my devices are most likely constantly monitored. I’ve been continually stalked, followed, and assaulted regularly with directed energy weapons of different types and results while living in three states, in seven different homes, while on vacations in other states, in Mexico and Canada, in hotels, in my car, and on commercial airlines. Assaults cause immediate pain and burning, involuntary muscle spasms, and external manipulation of moods, thoughts, and bodily functions.

As technologies have evolved, so have the manners, invasiveness, and severity in which I’m tortured. In the early 2000s, it was primarily V2K, sleep deprivation, constant hazing, and threats. I would have frequent deep wave vibrations in my ears causing intense itching down inside my ears that I couldn’t scratch. I was targeted and hit with focused energy beams that caused immediate intense pain. By 2006, I began a new job and began having facial tics and intense symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and had to continually go to the bathroom. In my next job, IBS subsided except in meetings and in close proximity with others. Around 2015, I began having severe head tremors when in front of groups, such as when I was trying to teach classes or lead meetings. I was also assaulted at work for the first time with infrared laser, leaving me blinded for over 30 minutes. Since around 2020, the assaults have more intensely targeted my head and are impacting cognitive abilities, focus, attention, and decision-making.

My sleep patterns are interrupted to push me into a state of exhaustion for days at a time. Throughout the nights, they transmit high frequencies through my head to stimulate brain activity and keep me mentally alert while continuing to haze me and manipulate my thoughts. Even as recently as November 15, 2023, I awoke to targeting on my knees while in bed and was followed back and forth through my house to my living room recliner, then the couch, and then back to bed. These attacks were from external sources immediately outside of my home.

Throughout this time, they’ve tried repeatedly to reprogram my thoughts through thought manipulation coupled with pain, or penile stimulation for pleasure to reinforce behavioral changes. In December 2023, I awoke to a continuous stream of narrative rants that were broadcast into my head at a very rapid pace. It startled me and I awoke trying to get a thought in edgewise and couldn’t interrupt the stream of voice programming. It was broadcast in my own voice.

Last year, I was also hit with an infrared laser while driving. Fortunately, I happened to look down at my console at that moment and was only partially temporarily blinded.

The torture and involuntary experimentation have profoundly affected me. It has caused damage to reputation and relationships with my family and friends and caused social isolation. They have chemically castrated me for lengthy periods to cause sexual humiliation, has caused loss of employment on several occasions, significant loss of income, and led me to deplete savings. The last time I was applying for a high paying job, they physically scarred my nose between interviews, effectively eliminating me from candidate selection. I awoke on the day of the second interview with lines and a network of laser burns on the right side of my nose and my face was microwaved bright red.

These and all attacks mentioned previously are premeditated coordinated physical assaults and are crimes against me. Subjecting me to continuous physical and mental assaults amounts to torture. Those responsible should be held accountable.

Torture has changed who I am by depriving me of my liberty and rights and giving me a victim mentality. I now hesitate to attempt to do anything outside of my safe known circle out of fear of what will come next. I’ve lost so much already that I feel compelled to fight just to hold on to what I still have. Even while participating in a federal rulemaking challenge to close loopholes in the Common Rule, I faced frequent escalating retaliatory assaults of increasing severity and duration.

I have been harmed in many ways by these technologies and methodologies, and by the federal rulemaking itself. What is being referred to as non-consensual human testing is a well-advanced torture and mind control program that the U.S. government is implementing and protecting under the guise of research and national security.

The Common Rule is based on the principles of the Belmont Report which are intended to protect human subjects :
1. Respect for persons: protecting the autonomy of all people and treating them with courtesy and respect and allowing for informed consent. Researchers must be truthful and conduct no deception (integrity); participants have the right to withdraw at any time.
2. Beneficence: the philosophy of “Do no harm” while maximizing benefits for the research project and minimizing risks to the research subjects. Researchers must assess the risks and benefits of the studies and ensure that the potential benefits outweigh any risks. This principle underlines the importance of protecting participants from harm while promoting their well-being.
3. Justice: ensuring reasonable, non-exploitative, and well-considered procedures are administered fairly—the fair distribution of costs and benefits to potential research participants—and equally.

By allowing Agency Head Waiver of approval for testing on a subject, and then by enacting the grandfather clause which allows for continued experimentation without informed consent on these subjects, the Revised Common Rule allows agencies to continue to conceal their identities and involvement and strips targeted individuals, including myself, of their rights and the legal mechanisms and protections the Common Rule was intended to protect, including the ability to opt out.

In order for an agency head to waive or alter consent, according to the Common Rule the agency must find and document :
3. (i) The research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects;
(ii) The research could not practicably be carried out without the requested waiver or alteration;
(iii) If the research involves using identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, the research could not practicably be carried out without using such information or biospecimens in an identifiable format;
(iv) The waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects; (v) Whenever appropriate, the subjects or legally authorized representatives will be provided with additional pertinent information after participation.

This is not a program with minimal risk or harm, nor is it something that has not adversely affected my rights and welfare. In addition, it appears there is no agency or Institutional Review Board oversight to protect the subjects.

As a targeted individual, over the past 26 years I have been subject to nonconsensual human experimentation, rape, deprivation of rights, physical and electronic assaults, drugging, mind control experimentation, emotional and physical duress, social isolation, involuntary micro-chipping, deprivation of bodily autonomy, disruption and termination of employment, illegal searches, car tampering, burglary, theft of personal property, obstruction of justice, hundreds of home invasions, tens of thousands of physical and electronic assaults which constitutes torture, hostile surveillance, threats to my welfare, freedom, and life, and deprivation of my civil and human rights that should be protected as a human being and an American citizen.

In addition, the law that allows exception for national intelligence that is protecting these actions, was passed as part of a Federal Rulemaking in the Final Rule on January 19, 2017. However, this exemption and addition to the Common Rule and how it is being applied is at minimum in violation of the 4th (unreasonable search), 5th (due cause and self- incrimination), and 14th (privileges and immunities of citizens, deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process, nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws) Amendments. The Bill of Rights Is Constitutional Law and refers to the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee fundamental liberties like freedom of speech, religion, and due process. These amendments are the highest legal authority in the United States. Any law that contradicts them is considered unconstitutional.

This program and these assaults deserve investigation, and I deserve protections guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, and international acts and treaties to protect human rights.

Please help to stop these gross human rights violations before the United States and other allies fully become police and surveillance states that are hostile and controlling over all populations.

Sincerely,

Victim of gross human rights violations in the United States