Organizations
Select “Groups” and enter “Targeting and Gangstalking” once in your account and on this page. Multiple groups of targeted individuals organized via Facebook from all over the United States and from countries around the world who wish to share their stories of targeting, stalking, assaults, directed energy weapons, related topics, and to provide support for each other.
Humanfreewill.org – Human Free Will is an emerging and newly formed organization that seeks SYSTEMIC CHANGE by addressing the root cause of oppression for the majority of the human population [The Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) enterprise of human exploitation]. With COVERT ACTION this government sanctioned enterprise seeks to disrupt the equitable distribution of ALL natural resources, power, and rights. OUR MISSION IS TO EMPOWER PEOPLE WITH THE TRUTH AND TO LIVE LIFE WITHOUT ANY INTERFERENCE.
/r/gangstalking is a subreddit that focuses upon presenting information about predatory gangstalking and also to exist as a community to organize as a group to spread awareness and education. As of August 9, 2025, this subreddit has 73,000 members and there are other subreddits and many article links within Reddit.
Stop Gangstalking Awareness Group
Well-designed professional-looking established site rich with articles and smartly written blog posts on many topics. TI themed merch. Love the unique site artwork and theme throughout.
Support for Targeted Individuals | Targeted Justice, Inc.
Largest and most well-known T&GS site in the United States and a beacon of hope for many targeted individuals. This site is well established and the group well-known for the David vs. Goliath $1.3 Billion lawsuit against the FBI, DHS, and high-ranking officials in both organizations. This group also does frequent activism and organizes statewide victims’ gatherings and protests and has established channels on YouTube and Facebook.
TargetedArmy.org – Take Action. Make Noise. Create Change.
TargetedArmy.org is a global unified action network and platform for Targeted Individuals that are experiencing organized harassment, gangstalking, technology-based targeting such as Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM), V2K, and other abuses often connected to “Project Puppet.”
We turn isolation into coordinated action. Here, victims become Soldiers—equipped with structured campaigns, call and letter tools, organized assignments, and step-by-step guidance designed to help you fight back, raise awareness, and demand accountability together.
Targeted UK for Targeted Individuals & Targeted Survivors
UK targeting and gangstalking awareness organization with global reach, many articles, links, and resources. Clear reports of activism including in the United States with reports of face-to-face meetings with high-level politicians, and awareness and activism campaigns. And something that really caught my attention that most TIs could benefit from, a personal wellness and development program designed by Mark Williams, TI and life coach.
Knowledgebase
TI World Day Documentary – 2024
Targeted Justice Media post from the Targeted Action 2024 event in Colorado Springs, Colorado, June 3, 2024.
Ethics of neurotechnology | UNESCO
Resources from the United Nations on neurotechnology that interacts with the human brain and discussions on the ethics and potentials for human rights abuses.
Federal Law
Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 2261A) outlines the elements of federal stalking, which include actions like crossing state lines with the intent to harass, intimidate, or place someone under surveillance, and engaging in conduct that causes the victim to fear for their safety or suffer emotional distress. In the U.S., stalking is generally a felony, particularly when it involves interstate travel or electronic communication.
Supreme Court Unanimously Greenlights Lawsuit Over FBI’s Botched Raid – Newsweek
This recent Supreme Court decision (24-362 Martin v. United States (06/12/2025)) limits sovereign immunity granted in lawsuits against the U.S. government under the Federal Tort Claims Act and opens the door for the government to be held accountable for wrongful acts committed by federal law enforcement officers and for “intentional violations of individual rights.”
State Laws
California Senate Bill No. 1223 – SB 1223, Becker. Consumer privacy: sensitive personal information: neural data. The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) grants to a consumer various rights with respect to personal information, as defined, that is collected by a business, as defined, including the right to direct a business that collects sensitive personal information about the consumer to limit its use of the consumer’s sensitive personal information to that use which is necessary to perform the services or provide the goods reasonably expected by an average consumer who requests those goods or services, to perform certain other services, and as authorized by certain regulations. The CCPA defines “sensitive personal information” to mean, among other things, the processing of biometric information, as defined, for the purpose of uniquely identifying a consumer. The California Privacy Rights Act of 2020, approved by the voters as Proposition 24 at the November 3, 2020, statewide general election, amended, added to, and reenacted the CCPA.
State Laws
Colorado HB 24-1058 – Colorado HB 24-1058 is a new law that strengthens privacy protections for people’s biological and brain-related data, making Colorado one of the first states to do so. This law expands the Colorado Privacy Act to include biological data—like genetic, physiological, or biochemical information—and neural data, which refers to data collected from brain activity. That means if a company collects or uses things like your DNA, brainwave patterns, or other body-related data, they now have to treat it as sensitive information and follow stricter rules about how they handle it. This includes getting your consent before collecting it, being transparent about how it’s used, and giving you rights to access or delete it.
The bill passed with strong bipartisan support and was signed into law in April 2024. It’s a proactive move to keep up with emerging technologies like brain-computer interfaces and biometric tracking, which are becoming more common in healthcare, tech, and even consumer devices. By recognizing the unique risks tied to biological and neural data, Colorado is aiming to protect residents from misuse or unauthorized access to some of the most personal information imaginable.
Minnesota MN SF1110 A bill for an act relating to data privacy; establishing neurodata rights; modifying certain crimes to add neurodata elements; providing civil and criminal penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2022, sections 13.04, by adding a subdivision; 609.88, subdivision 2; 609.891, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 325E.
Montana State Bill 163 Senate Bill 163 aims to regulate the collection and use of genetic and neural technology data. It establishes stringent guidelines for entities that collect such data, requiring explicit consent from consumers, parents, or guardians before any collection, use, or disclosure. The bill mandates separate consent for actions like transferring data to third parties, using data for purposes beyond initial testing, and retaining biological samples after testing. It also requires consumers to be informed if their data will be used for research or marketing based on their genetic information. The bill has sparked considerable debate, with both proponents and industry stakeholders expressing differing views on its implications for consumer rights and innovation.
Section 30-23-101.(d…) states, “neurotechnologies, including devices capable of recording, interpreting, and altering the response of an individual’s central or peripheral nervous system to its internal or external environment, raise particularly pressing privacy concerns given their ability to monitor, decode, and manipulate brain activity;
(e) data concerning the activity of the human brain and wider nervous systems, or “neurotechnology data”, is extremely sensitive and can reveal intimate information about individuals, including information about health, mental states, emotions, and cognitive functioning;
(f) each human brain is unique, meaning that neural data is specific to the individual from whom it is collected. Because neurotechnology data contains distinctive information about the structure and functioning of individual brains and nervous systems, it contains sensitive information that may link the data to an identified or identifiable individual.
(g) the collection of neurotechnology data involves the involuntary disclosure of information. Even if individuals consent to the collection and processing of their data for narrow use, they are unlikely to be fully aware of the content or quality of information they are sharing.
(h) neurotechnology users cannot decide what specific neurotechnology information they would like to disclose, and they are unlikely to understand the extent to which their neurotechnology data can be decoded, currently or in the future. Neurotechnologies can collect and process information about an individual that the individual did not even know existed.”
Nevada U.S. Code: title 18 part I Chapter 113C 2340C Electronic Torture Act
Proposal for Electronic Torture Act from targeted individual Amy Holem in State of Nevada that should be adopted nationally to implement adequate protections for targeted people. “The purposes of electronic torture are known to alter the human mind and behavior without authorization and consent of the person. Electronic Torture is a form of psychological warfare and social engineering tactics that alters the persons thoughts views and perspectives and religious beliefs. It also a form of video voyeurism that sexually assaults the victim or person to Violate their privacy, their privacy, first amendment rights, perform cruel and unusual punishment under the eight amendments. The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th, amendments are all being violated. The use of Electronic Torture through electronic weapons, electronic devices and non-lethal weapon systems allows the victim to be discredited when filing a complaint to any law enforcement and federal agencies.”
Oregon HB 3756 – Relating to electromagnetic weapons, Chief Sponsor: Representative Nosse
Oregon House Bill 3756 establishes a Task Force on Electromagnetic Weapons to study the weapons’ usage in the state and identify gaps in Oregon law. The task force will specifically investigate how these weapons are being used and recommend revisions to the state’s legal framework to address any identified issues. The task force will report its findings and recommendations to the legislature’s interim committees related to the judiciary by December 1, 2026 and the task force will sunset on December 31, 2026.
Related Articles
States pass privacy laws to protect brain data collected by devices – CBS News
